RE: [xsl] Re: topological sort

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] Re: topological sort

Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: topological sort
From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:00:36 -0000

> So your construct count be replaced by:
> 
>   not(field/type/ref[not(. = $processed/name)])
> 
> I'm not sure whether this will be more efficient - it probably depends
> on the processor.  

In Saxon it almost certainly will be. The count()=count() construct will
fully enumerate both node-sets, whereas the not(x[not(y)]) construct will
stop as soon as the first relevant element is found.

Mike Kay
> 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Re: topological sort, (continued) Joerg Pietschmann - Mon, 08 Jan 2001 10:29:05 +0100 Jeni Tennison - Mon, 8 Jan 2001 11:42:33 +0000 Joerg Pietschmann - Mon, 08 Jan 2001 14:57:32 +0100 Jeni Tennison - Mon, 8 Jan 2001 15:41:29 +0000 Kay Michael - Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:00:36 -0000 <= Kay Michael - Mon, 8 Jan 2001 16:07:11 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Re: topological sort, Jeni Tennison	Thread	RE: [xsl] Re: topological sort, Kay Michael
Re: [xsl] Finding the maximun numbe, Dimitre Novatchev	Date	[xsl] Identity preservation of node, Handren Mokri
	Month