Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT or DOM or SAX? From: "Craig Pfeifer" <cpfeifer@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 08:29:19 -0500 |
Thanks for your response. I'm currently tasked w/figuring out how to break large WML decks into smaller, device friendly decks. I was having a hard time w/it in XSLT and.wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Robertson" <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 5:13 PM Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT or DOM or SAX? > At 07:50 3/01/2001, Craig Pfeifer wrote: > > >I wanted to know how you knew if/when you have reached the limits of XSLT, > >and it's time to look at a DOM / SAX solution? What sorts of > >transformations are too difficult/awkward to accomplish in XSLT and are > >better left to DOM / SAX implementations? > > DOM/SAX seems a pretty low-level alternative > to XSLT. > > You might want to have a look at Omnimark > instead for more complex transformations. > > J > > ------------------------- > James Robertson > Step Two Designs Pty Ltd > SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy > Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution > > http://www.steptwo.com.au/ > jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT or DOM or SAX?, Craig Pfeifer | Thread | [xsl] Specifying element associated, Paul Caton |
Re: [xsl] XSLT or DOM or SAX?, Craig Pfeifer | Date | [xsl] Programming without Assignmen, Dan . Diebolt |
Month |