Subject: [xsl] Re: XSL-List Digest V3 #432 From: Dave Gomboc <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:33:18 -0700 (MST) |
> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:37:21 -0500 > From: Steven.C.Kienle@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re[2]: Possible new key () function (Was: Re: [xsl] Finding t > > We should remember that early database technologies required keys to > be explicitly used during data access. SQL improved things, but it > still requires that someone define what keys are likely to be used > (via CREATE INDEX statements/constraints). Hmm. AFAIK it is now common for databases to create temporary indexes (that live for the duration of the operation) to accelerate operations involving joins. > > Perhaps this can be changed now, but I think a lot more thought would > need to be put into it before a workable alternative could be > designed. Fair enough! > Steve Dave Gomboc XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XML Tools for Linux & Unix, Bill | Thread | [xsl] forwarded message from owner-, Tony Graham |
[xsl] XML Tools for Linux & Unix, Bill | Date | [xsl] forwarded message from owner-, Tony Graham |
Month |