|
Subject: Re: [xsl] double indirection with keys? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:57:20 GMT |
> But the XPath-Spec seems to indicate that predicates are not allowed
> inside predicates.
No, they are allowed.
> The relevant pieces of the my source-document
The key you showed had elements from an fo: namespace
what namespace is that (XSL FO?) in any event they didn't appear to be
any such in th einput fragment you showed.
without keys it would appear that you want
<xsl:if test"'fixed' =/*/*/style:font-decl[@style:name=
/*/*/style:style[@style:name=current()/@text:style-name]/@style:font-name
]/@style:font-pitch">
(untested, optimising with keys left as exercise for reader)
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] double indirection with keys?, Tobias Grundmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] double indirection with k, Tobias Grundmann |
| RE: [xsl] Removing Duplicates, by way of Mulberry T | Date | [xsl] MSXML3 CAB File Redistributab, Joshua Allen |
| Month |