|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Detecting presence of attributes From: Peter Flynn <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 23:30:25 +2400 |
Thanks to all those who pointed out that @foo can be used as
a standalone Boolean as well as the LH side of an =. RTFM would
have been a good idea, but being so used to the explicitness of
Omnimark I didn't actually expect XSLT to possess the feature :-)
>XT honors (a) and not (b) and that's the right behavior.
That now follows.
>To get the feature you want to have, you need to convert the node-set
>into a string first:
No, all I wanted was detection of the existence of the attribute.
I'm not clear what converting the node-set into a string achieves.
[position()]
>I don't see this either.
This looks like my xt may be out of date. Strange, I only downloaded
it a few
weeks ago. Take a simple example: I have an attribute declared as
ENTITIES
whose values are multiple entity names which I want output as a list
separated by commas instead of spaces:
<xsl:for-each select="@foo">
<xsl:value-of select="."/>
<xsl:if test="not(position()=last)">
<xsl:text>,</xsl:text>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
I'm curious to know why the output contains the entity names separated
by spaces
instead of commas.
///Peter
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Detecting presence of att, Rosa I-Ting Cheng | Thread | Re: [xsl] Detecting presence of att, David Carlisle |
| Re: [xsl] Detecting presence of att, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Detecting presence of att, Dimitre Novatchev |
| Month |