Subject: Re: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 18:19:37 -0600 |
At 23:43 2001 02 06 +0000, Peter Flynn wrote: >On Tue, 06 Feb 2001, Paul wrote: >> XML--along with its >> concept of well-formedness and its companion specs such as >> Infoset, XInclude, XSLT, XML Schema etc.--has, for better >> or worse, taken us beyond that. > >I'm not sure "beyond" is right. "Beside" is probably closer. > >Your description of the process of xinclusion is very useful, >but when working with some applications there is a requirement >to conduct some form of checking that the entity being included >conforms to some kind of known pattern _before_ inclusion >(or indeed, rejection) takes place, in order to ensure that any >subsequent process (like applying styles) won't blow up in your >face because some idiot edited the file with Notepad and got >a typo in some markup. Some XML parser has to parse all the entities-to-be-included, and it sounds like your application should use a validating parser to do that. That way, each bit would be validated against its own DTD before inclusion. paul XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon, Peter Flynn | Thread | Re: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon, Peter Flynn |
Re: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon, Peter Flynn | Date | Re: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon, Peter Flynn |
Month |