Subject: RE: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:08:22 -0000 |
> > I'm not sure it would be conformant to XSLT. The XSLT spec leaves no room to > > treat xinclude:include as anything other that a literal > result element, if it appears in the source tree. > > Untrue. Misleading perhaps but not untrue. I did add the qualifier "if it appears in the source tree". Having thought about it a bit more, it seems perfectly reasonable to give the user an option as to whether the xinclude:include should appear in the XSLT source tree or should be expanded first by the parser, or by some intermediate filter. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | Re: [xsl] XInclude in Cocoon, Uche Ogbuji |
[xsl] fo:leader for table of conten, Sven Kohl | Date | [xsl] what is difference in xalan X, anand awasthi |
Month |