Subject: RE: [xsl] So THAT'S what CDATA is for...] From: RSuiter@xxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:51:05 -0600 |
Unfair to COBOL programmers, but otherwise right as rain. > The Real World, of course, in the shape of the average commercial programmer > who should have stuck to COBOL, happily ignores the risk that the data might > contain "]]>". Rick Suiter XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] So THAT'S what CDATA is f, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] So THAT'S what CDATA is f, jim smith |
[xsl] How do you get the most recen, Tom Gilbert | Date | [xsl] International Characters in a, Michael Storm |
Month |