Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:44:07 -0500 |
And without touching XSLT 1.0 we will have achieved everything XSLT 1.1 claims, but in a language-neutral way, and a way that respects the layering between XSLT and extensions.
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible (IDG Books, 1999) | | http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/books/bible/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764532367/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Steve Muench | Thread | xsl:script considered dangerous -- , Clark C. Evans |
Re[2]: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Steven . C . Kienle | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, DPawson |
Month |