Subject: [xsl] Microsoft CLR (was: XSLT 1.1 comments) From: "Stu Bloom" <sbloom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:48:27 -0600 |
Adam Van Den Hoven wrote: >So I stand behind my statement but I'd really like a Microsoft body confirm or deny what I believe is true.< >From http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/01/02/vbnet/vbnet.asp, with my additions in [brackets]: "A second obvious benefit of MSIL [Microsoft Intermediate Language] is that it decouples your EXEs and DLLs from any specific operating system or hardware platform. Microsoft currently has plans to ship a version of the CLR [Common Language Runtime] for Windows 2000, Windows NT®, Windows 98, and Windows 95. However, MSIL is powerful because it gives your DLLs and EXEs the potential of running on platforms other than those based on the Intel x86 processors. "You are likely to see a version of the CLR for Windows CE in the near future. It is also entirely possible that you will see implementations of the CLR built for other operating systems and hardware platforms as well." And, from http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/periodic/period00/framework.htm: "Once written and built, a managed .NET application (that consists entirely of managed code ... ) can execute on any platform that supports the .NET common language runtime. It is even possible that a version of the common language runtime could be built for platforms other than Windows in the future. Users will immediately appreciate the value of this broad execution model when they need to support multiple computing hardware configurations or operating systems." Stu Bloom XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Adam Van Den Hoven | Thread | Re: [xsl] Microsoft CLR (was: XSLT , Elliotte Rusty Harol |
[xsl] regarding xsl:script, Rosa I-Ting Cheng | Date | Re: [xsl] Microsoft CLR (was: XSLT , Elliotte Rusty Harol |
Month |