Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:33:16 -0000 |
> Hmm. Let's see, on the side that insists on language-bound > xsl:script are > Michael Kay, Steve Muench and Scott Boag. All Java XSLT > implementors, I should add. And all getting frequent emails from users saying "why can't I write a Java extension that is portable between Xalan and Saxon and Oracle." > All, it seems, reluctant to > pursue standardizing extensions using the existing XSLT 1.0 > facilities. Not in my case as an individual. Nor do I think the group as a whole has any reluctance to do this. It just didn't put it top of the list. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji |
RE: [xsl] Converting &, >, <, ", an, Kevin Duffey | Date | RE: [xsl] Converting &, >, <, ", an, Kevin Duffey |
Month |