Subject: Re: [xsl] Reliance on import precedence considered dangerous From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:08:55 GMT |
> (on both it's factual or it's status as a known > problem that David first identified 18 months ago). Funny you should mention that. This bit us (on a real project) some time back while working on a stylesheet that was xsl:importing a much hacked version of Norm's docbook styles. > In honour of David Carlisle's penchant for OP Not really that fond of it ('twas Jiri Jirat that started that particular thread) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Reliance on import precedence, Jeni Tennison | Thread | [xsl] XSLT 2.0 Requirements - Regul, Dylan Walsh |
RE: [xsl] xsl:include still a probl, DPawson | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Francis Norton |
Month |