Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:12:23 -0700 |
> : There is strong de-coupling between core SQL and any > : particular "language > : binding" (I assume you mean SQLC, SQLJ and the like). > > Not to get off-topic, but how do you explain JDBC from Java's point of view? > I don't think there are many people who have problems with escaping into SQL > query from inside Java... or are there? JDBC is not a SQL "binding". It is purely an outside-in API. The equivalent for XSLT would be a spec that allows you to invoke a processor from Java and handle the results (TRaX?). This sort of thing is by no stretch a "binding". -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Clark C. Evans | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Kaganovich, Yevgeniy |
[xsl] for-each question, Alec Cove | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji |
Month |