Subject: RE: [xsl] portability, correctness question From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:36:37 -0000 |
> > Im currently using XT to do transformations. in your opinion is it ok, > portable, correct, etc to do the following? > > > <xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes"><![CDATA[ > ..a lot of complex html, javascript and style sheet stuff that I > dont want to worry about > ]]></xsl:text> > It's not portable but it will work with most processors provided you write the output to a file and don't try to use it as XML. It's correct but not good practice, though with legacy HTML data it may be the best you can do in the circumstances. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] portability, correctness ques, Alec Cove | Thread | [xsl] sun xsltc deos not support xs, Awasthi, Anand |
RE: [xsl] namespace::* or what?, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, David Carlisle |
Month |