Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Re: Reliance on import precedence considered dangerous From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:14:19 +0000 |
Hi Dimitre, >> David said that he had a real-life example of this problem. > > David said this was a problem -- not that this was useful. I hope you're not implying that David would ever try to do anything that wasn't useful?!? ;) >> Having thought about it some more, the real issue is if both B & C >> (which both import D and are both imported by A) override something >> in D in different ways. I don't think(?) that a virtual attribute >> would address this problem? > > It will, because there will not be a second imported identical > stylesheet that precedes some overrides. Sorry, I was talking here about: B -- D / A + \ C -- D where B and C both contain the same named template. They both happen to be overriding the same named template in D (which is how come they have the same name), but that's really by the by. In terms of this particular template, you can forget about D - it's not important. The tree may as well look like: B / A + \ C There are no identical stylesheets in this situation but the problem (of a stylesheet no longer behaving as it did when it was standalone) still occurs as the template in C overrides the template in B. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Re: Re: Reliance on impor, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Re: Reliance on i, Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] Re: Re: Re: Reliance on impor, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: [ANNOUNCE] XSLT-proce, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |