RE: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template

Subject: RE: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 09:10:14 -0000
> In short, I see the 'function requirements as completely
> different from the 'template requirements; and as such
> they should be seperate constructs.  I belive this is your
> position isn't it?  IMHO, trying to merge them will be 
> FAQ heaven....

Yes, that's exactly the conclusion I came to.

Mike Kay

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread