Subject: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT functions From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:08:24 -0000 |
> > > I think clearly separating the specification of the abilities: > > > > > > -> to statically define and statically > > > invoke functions in XSLT, and > > > > > > -> to dynamically invoke functions I don't see any need for special syntax to invoke functions whose name is decided at run-time. That can easily be done using a general-purpose evaluate() extension that constructs XPath expressions from strings. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, Uche Ogbuji |
RE: [xsl] apply-imports, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT function, Michael Kay |
Month |