Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax su

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)

Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)
From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:54:46 -0500 (EST)

On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > In other words: only one exsl:result element should be instantiated
> > when the content of exsl:function is processed - if more than one is
> > instantiated then only the first actually matters, the rest are
> > ignored.
> 
> Should it be the first or the last that is accepted?
> 

I think the roles of "building the result" and "returning" control
should be distinct; see my previous e-mail.

Clark


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template), (continued) Jeni Tennison - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:03:00 +0000 Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:24:32 -0700 Jeni Tennison - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:12:19 +0000 Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:39:21 -0700 Clark C. Evans - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:54:46 -0500 (EST) <= Michael Kay - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:59:08 -0000 Jeni Tennison - Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:00:22 +0000 Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:54:57 -0700 Michael Kay - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:20:22 -0000

Current Thread

Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Uche Ogbuji	Thread	[xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT function, Michael Kay
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Uche Ogbuji	Date	Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Clark C. Evans
	Month