|
Subject: Re: The top 10 limitations of XSLT 1.0 (was RE: [xsl] RE: Designsfor XSLT functions) From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:45:04 +0000 |
"Clark C. Evans" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Andrew Kimball wrote:
> > If the top 10 limitations of XSLT 1.0 were solved, then I think the roar
> > of demand for xsl:script and xsl:evaluate would be reduced to a whimper.
>
> Hurray!
>
> > 1. The lack of real string comparison
> > 2. No support for dates
> > 3. No simple mechanism for grouping
> > 4. No querying into RTF's
> 5. More node-set operations: intersect, difference, and equals
> 6. Poor support for modulization (template calling syntax sucks)
> 7. No ability to create functions in XSLT callable from XPath
8. Support for file-spec skeletons in document() or in a specific
dir() function
Francis.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: The top 10 limitations of XSLT , Clark C. Evans | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: Re: Designs for XSLT , Dimitre Novatchev |
| [xsl] Select distinct elements, Jakub Maly | Date | Re: [xsl] 2.1 Must Allow Matching o, Dave Hartnoll |
| Month |