Subject: Re: [xsl] 2.1 Must Allow Matching on Default Namespace Without Explicit Prefix From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:59:25 -0700 |
> > But you still didn't answer my question. Will the default > > namespace be used > > to evaluate XPath expressions? I know they're different > > specs, but I think > > inconsistency there would cause even more confusion. > > What's published so far is a requirements statement. Don't assume that > anyone knows what the solution to the requirement will be. It's quite > possible that the working group will decide that there's no acceptable > solution that meets the compatibility goals. All the requirements statement > says is that there's a recognized problem that needs to be addressed. Hmm. OK, but in response to my xsl:script comment, Daniel Viellard posted that it's too late: it's already enshrined int he 1.1. requirements. Daniel of course used to be a W3C staffer. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] 2.1 Must Allow Matching o, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] 2.1 Must Allow Matching o, Daniel Veillard |
Re: [xsl] 2.1 Must Allow Matching o, Uche Ogbuji | Date | [xsl] Re: FXPath - A comment on EXS, Jeni Tennison |
Month |