Subject: Re: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer of indirection From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 01:19:58 +0000 |
Hi Clark, > Where in the xsl:script spec is a URI provided to identify the > functionality described? There is a prefix, and this is not a global > URI. Also there is a "src", and this is not a language independent > URI and must be missing when the script code is included in the > stylesheet. So, What am I missing? Where is this > implementation-independent-uri in the 1.1 Draft? I think that the namespace URI referred to by the implements-prefix attribute is the implementation independent URI. Several xsl:script elements can share the same prefix/URI but have different languages. Presumably the namespace URI referred to by the implements-prefix attribute would resolve to an implementation-independent functional description of the functions in that module/namespace in the same way that the namespace URI used for a particular XML vocabulary would resolve to some kind of description of the vocabulary (i.e. you might get something human-readable, you might get something machine-readable, you might not get anything at all). Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:scrip, Clark C. Evans | Thread | RE: [xsl] RDDL as a delivery vehicl, Diamond, Jason |
Re: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:scrip, Steve Muench | Date | Re: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:scrip, Clark C. Evans |
Month |