Subject: RE: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer ofindir ection From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 20:42:54 -0000 |
> > and I'd still like the attribute to reflect what it means, > > But almost no one has made this objection (on this list) about > the existing extension-element-prefixes attribute (prior to > the current > thread). This has identical usage, you refer to a namespace by a > currently bound prefix. Why object to the usage on xsl:script? My particular response came from finding sympathy in the remark. This weekend I spent about 2 hours staring at a stylesheet to create an xsl stylesheet. Mikes book example indicated that the result should have prefix xsl. Indeed the m$ processor gave me that. Xalan and Saxon gave me out: (all had the correct ns). OK I'm not as astute as some, I missed it. I believe its one more stumbling block that wouldn't take much to fix. And yes, I would like all of them aligned. to mean what they say. Regards DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: multilingual web site, Joerg Pietschmann | Thread | [xsl] Mac OS & FOP, Barry Workman |
RE: [xsl] MSXML3 bug - xsl:variable, Andrew Kimball | Date | Re: [xsl] translate (string, '', Mike Brown |
Month |