Subject: RE: [xsl] namespace values From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 21:18:51 -0000 |
> I just lost interest in both the RDDL and EXSLT discussions because I > apparently missed the posts that said why these things were so necessary. > What reason do these specs have to exist? What problems do they solve? Who > should be reading them and building implementations around them? No one > has bothered to put this information in the specs themselves. As far as RDDL is concerned, I've documented the discussions leading up to the specification of RDDL in a recent XML Deviant column [1]. XML.com also recently published my RDDL tutorial [2] which should also provide some additional background and examples. I hope these are useful. [1]. http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/01/10/rddl.html [2]. http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/02/28/rddl.html Cheers, L. -- Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect | "Pluralitas non est ponenda http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitate" http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[exsl] rationale (Was: Re: [xsl] na, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] namespace values, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] flushing a variable in XS, Peter Flynn | Date | Re: [xsl] retrive data from #1 xml , Walter Torres |
Month |