Subject: Re: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Complier? From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:41:03 +0100 |
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:43:14AM +1100, Tim Watts wrote: > If you would like to see some more benchmark tests there are results at > http://www.datapower.com/XSLTMark/res_2000_11_20.html > > Xalan C and Sablotron are the two C++ XSLT Parsers tested there and the > others are Java I doubt MSXML 3.0 be written in Java ... but I may be wrong, I never saw the source, nor run it :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Compli, Tim Watts | Thread | RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Compli, Dylan Walsh |
Re: [xsl] new line, Mike Brown | Date | [xsl] Functional programming in XSL, Alexey Gokhberg |
Month |