Subject: RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Complier? From: "Ball, Mike" <Mike.Ball@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:40:09 -0000 |
Hi Dylan > When you said "The speed was unimpressive - no faster than > Xalan 1 from > the command > line" I infered that you were running both of them from the command > line, and in such a case the JVM startup time dwarves any > difference in > transformation speed. Yes, my use of language was somewhat ambiguous. Sorry. I should also mention that I was using preview 4 and I have just been informed by someone on the development team that there was a significant performance drop in this release and that preview 5 is much faster. Mike Ball Application Services Consultant Software AG UK -- The content of this e-mail is confidential, may contain privileged material and is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above. If you receive this in error, please notify Software AG immediately and delete this e-mail. Software AG (UK) Limited Registered in England & Wales 1310740 Registered Office: Hudson House, Hudson Way, Pride Park, Derby DE24 8HS -- The content of this e-mail is confidential, may contain privileged material and is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above. If you receive this in error, please notify Software AG immediately and delete this e-mail. Software AG (UK) Limited Registered in England & Wales 1310740 Registered Office: Hudson House, Hudson Way, Pride Park, Derby DE24 8HS XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT Performance an issue, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] xml:output encoding as iso-8, Neil Hunter |
RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Compli, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] What does position() real, Michael Kay |
Month |