Subject: [xsl] Re: Inserting into a String From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 11:47:41 GMT |
> Wouldn't it be nice to have more "shouting" with such results in the > future? :o)) yes, I do rather wish xsl had followed dsssl and mandated tail recursion elimination in implementations. It isn't always trivial to write things in tail recursive form, but at least in a language that specifies tail recursion is implemented as iteration, you know it is a worthwhile effort, but in XSL you just have to hope. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Inserting into a String, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?, bryan . s . schnabel |
Re: [xsl] Functional programming in, David . Rosenborg | Date | Re: [xsl] browsers with XSL capabil, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |