Subject: Re: [xsl] Functional programming in XSLT From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:35:16 -0700 |
> Jeni Tennison wrote: > > > That's one vote for exsl:result (Uche) and one vote for exsl:return > > (you). Any other opinions? > > Is it doing something or being something? Is it to be viewed as an > instruction to the processor to perform a return, or as a statement that > at this point we are seeing some value? If that decision is impossible > or the answer ambiguous, ummm ... avoid the issue: "exsl:return-value" > could be read as imperative by those who want imperative and as nominal > by those who want nominal :-) I actually like this dodge. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Functional programming in, Uche Ogbuji |
Re: [xsl] Functional programming in, Uche Ogbuji | Date | Re: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:, Uche Ogbuji |
Month |