Subject: Re: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:result (Was: Re: [xsl] Functional programming in XSLT) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:04:02 GMT |
>This is for situations > when the variable computation is complex enough that it cannot be > written as a simple `select' attribute and has to written as a > template. but how do you propose that a template return such nodes? If instead you use exsl:function then what was a template becomes a function so you can put arbitrarily complex stuff into a single select. select="my:function(xxx)" where my:function is defined by one of the extension proposals in these threads. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:, Lassi A. Tuura | Thread | Re: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:, Lassi A. Tuura |
RE: [xsl] How can I test if element, Denis Kranjcec | Date | Re: [xsl] Which xmlns:xsl to use ?, David Carlisle |
Month |