Subject: RE: [xsl] Odd bug? in msxml3 xslt implementation From: Stephane Bailliez <sbailliez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:25:57 +0100 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Unico Hommes [mailto:Unico@xxxxxxxx] [...] > ... I wouldn't be able to use the above xslt since it only checks for > equality to the previous item name, unless I found a way to > sort the items > by item name in wich case I cannot use a the named template strategy I > guess. Does anybody have a solution to this problem, is there > perhaps an > xpath statement that would allow me to filter down my node > set of <item>s to > only those that have unique item names, in wich case I could > use iteration ? <xsl:apply-templates select="./item[not(./name = preceding-sibling::item/name)]"/> Unless I did a mistake, the above should do what you want (assuming you sorted your itemlist based on item name) Hope it helps. -- Stéphane Bailliez Software Engineer, Paris - France iMediation - http://www.imediation.com Disclaimer: All the opinions expressed above are mine and not those from my company. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Odd bug? in msxml3 xslt i, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] Odd bug? in msxml3 xslt i, Unico Hommes |
Re: [xsl] Can one element have more, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] Odd bug? in msxml3 xslt i, Jeni Tennison |
Month |