Subject: RE: [xsl] Latest XSLTMark benchmark From: "Kevin Jones" <kjouk@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:37:45 +0100 |
> >> for some of the tests. To give Java processors a chance to warm >up I think >> you should really do some un-timed runs followed by some timed ones where >> runs is significantly >10. > >Good idea... So good that the current version already does that! >Here is what XSLTMark 2.0 prints out when running with XT. > >dummy initialization run: >xslbench3: xslbench3.xsl xslbenchdream.xml ... done in >644ms. This is clearly better than none at all but I doubt its enough for technologies like Hotspot to really get to grips with a particular stylesheet. The advise I got was to run *each* test at least 100 times before starting timing to get maximum Java speed. There also appears to be a difference depending on if/how the processor implements output indenting. I just got some better scores by making indenting the default as apposed to no indenting. I guess the stylesheets could just be set to turn this off. Regards, Kev. p.s. I had a problem with dgnorm on my Win2k box. The distributed one just kept crashing but if built manually it was ok. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Latest XSLTMark benchmark, Eugene Kuznetsov | Thread | RE: [xsl] Latest XSLTMark benchmark, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] remove 'invisable' white , cutlass | Date | RE: [xsl] Latest XSLTMark benchmark, Kevin Jones |
Month |