Subject: Re: Q: Relative paths in xsl:import Was: [xsl] Parameter in "xsl:include" From: Teppo Peltonen <teppo.peltonen@xxxxxx> Date: 03 Apr 2001 14:35:23 +0300 |
Peter Flynn <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: <offtopic> > Not only that, but a programming language can write a file of code > in its own or another language, place a call to the OS which will > ... ;-) Very funny. Let me rephrase: It is a common practise in Java programs to dynamically load executable code based on runtime information. How about that? However, don't ask me how "common practise" is defined... </offtopic> > *ought* to be used. If I give "foo/bar" as a href value, I mean "foo > as a subdirectory of whatever directory you happen to be executing > in". Yep, and the problem which I thought I had was that I didn't know where I was. But as Mike Kay said in the other reply, |The relative URI is interpreted relative to the stylesheet location, not |relative to the current working directory. So, I suppose it should work, if the style sheet compiler gets access to the URL of the original style sheet and not some input stream abstraction, a DOM tree or whatever. How is a relative location interpreted if the location of the original style sheet is unknown? Well, maybe I don't need to know that... just thinking aloud. Thank you very much for your help, Teppo -- Teppo Peltonen <mailto:teppo.peltonen@xxxxxx> phone 09 4566080 VTT Information Technology mobile 040 5651878 Tekniikantie 4 B, P.O.Box 1201, Espoo 02044 VTT telefax 09 4567052 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Q: Relative paths in xsl:import, Peter Flynn | Thread | [xsl] Ridiculous XPath expression, , Nick Vincent |
RE: [xsl] Dynamic Sorting - More pa, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Ridiculous XPath expression, , Nick Vincent |
Month |