Subject: Re: [xsl] Ridiculous XPath expression, can I reduce it? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:17:17 +0100 |
^W on emacs (or ^X on a windows-y editor would probably make it smaller...) > which basically finds all the elements that exist below any given > <input.form> tag but not below an <input.link> tag. does it? If I didn't look at the sample code you'd posted I'd code the requested selection as .//*[ancestor::input.form and not(ancestor::input.link)] The code you posted seemed to be doing something with @done and also checking there was exactly one ancestor. Also it restricted * to a fixed list of element names. You may change * in the above to *[self::input.hidden or self::input.text or ....] if you really need this restriction. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Ridiculous XPath expressi, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | RE: [xsl] Ridiculous XPath expressi, Nick Vincent |
[xsl] Using document() and namespac, Ruben Inoto | Date | RE: [xsl] Ridiculous XPath expressi, Nick Vincent |
Month |