Subject: Re: [xsl] Unique headers From: Dan Diebolt <dandiebolt@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:28:55 -0700 (PDT) |
> .... meaning that I did not want the 'General' type to be categorized. Only Got that, this is the classic case of "Quasi-Unique headers" TN>Perhaps you are over-simplifying your problem? I am guessing that you TN>may in fact want to do grouping/sorting on XML which is not in the TN>required order, i.e. the 'Horror' titles do not in fact appear TN>consecutively. Seems odd to me that you would not want to corral General movies into one group. Otherwise it leads to interleaving individual General movies among groups of non-General movies. If you want to deflate just the General movies so they aren't indented and appear without a header, this is easily done with a little inline logic (xsl:if ...). __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Unique headers, Kanthi Damodaran | Thread | RE: [xsl] xsl to xsl doing it right, Darrin Bishop |
RE: [xsl] case insensitive attribut, Jay Gardner | Date | [xsl] Pop Up in XSLT, Burge, Morais L Mr U |
Month |