Subject: Re: [xsl] XHTML friendly XSL processor From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:11:21 +0100 |
I'm tired of fighting with the Microsoft processor... Is there an XHTML friendly XSL processor ? msxsl is really one of the better ones (despite being a creation of the EE) This is assuming you have MSXML3: If you are using earlier versions then they only support an entirely different language to XSLT. I have in my 'xsl:output' tag the 'method=xml' but when I try to use : <xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes">&nbsp;</xsl:text> Why would you want to do that anyway? Just use   it is simpler and guaranteed to work, whereas disable-output-encoding is explicitly specified as not being guaranteed to work, it is a last resort hack for special situations. It seems the output method is automatically changed to 'html' and screws everything up. All I get is : <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"></HEAD> <BODY></BODY></HTML> I would guess that this is due to an error in the stylesheet rather than a feature of msxsl, but hard to tell given the information posted. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XHTML friendly XSL processor, dwight funk | Thread | [xsl] xPath and default namespaces., dwight funk |
Re: [xsl] xPath and default namespa, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Xsl Start Lines, Michael Kay |
Month |