RE: [xsl] Trade Marks

Subject: RE: [xsl] Trade Marks
From: Peter Flynn <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 03:00:34 +0100
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Paul Clapham wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: murali meraga [mailto:meraga_m@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: April 16, 2001 10:46
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [xsl] Trade Marks
> Thank you very much David,
>   TM and REG works fine. But SM is not. 

So far as I have been able to find out, Service Mark
is a marketing invention and does not seem to have
any kind of meaning or backing. This may be different
in different countries, however: check locally.


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread