Subject: Re: [xsl] Sorting and Grouping revisited From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 12:46:41 +0100 |
> Then I realised that because the new node-set was created by value > rather than by reference the nodes are actually in "RTF order", as when > the variable was created. yes the new node set is essentially a new document (so restrictions on keys being in same document as context node, etc all apply.) the node set itself of course is unordered however you look at it as it is a singleton just consisting of a root node. the sorted list stays sorted as they are children of that root. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Sorting and Grouping revi, Francis Norton | Thread | RE: [xsl] Sorting and Grouping revi, Michael Kay |
[xsl] String match within block of , Tanzila Mohammad | Date | Re: [xsl] Transform min and max val, Jeni Tennison |
Month |