Subject: Re: [xsl] Transitive closure for XPath From: "Christian Nentwich" <c.nentwich@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:21:31 +0100 |
> XQuery allows user-defined functions, which can of course be recursive, so > I'd guess that you are more likely to see a solution along those lines. That's not something I'm particularly looking forward to. XPath expressions are short, concise and can be selected by a lightweight process. You will probably have your own opinion on how XQuery compares to those requirements... Also, a path fits in one string. I've e-mailed xsl-editors@xxxxxx, might as well try :) Christian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Transitive closure for XP, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Transitive closure for XP, Francis Norton |
Re: [xsl] Transitive closure for XP, Christian Nentwich | Date | Re: [xsl] Transitive closure for XP, Jeni Tennison |
Month |