Subject: RE: [xsl]Jumping out a loop AND Starting loop at another node From: David_Marston@xxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:10:42 -0400 |
Patrick, thanks for agreeing with me 95%. :) >http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt11/#for-each clearly states that the nodes >are PROCESSED in document order. Not just outputed in document order. But the only "net effect" of that order that you can depend on is the order of the outputs. While processing any given source node in the so-called loop, you can't depend on any other nodes "already having been processed" in any temporal sense. What you can do, as was given to Tanz in some answers, is refer to position() in a way that parallel threads could each independently calculate. The parallel threads need not synchronize, as long as they give the appearance of processing the nodes in document (or sorted) order. The way they "give the appearance" is by the order of their outputs. .................David Marston XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl]Jumping out a loop AND Sta, Patrick Moore | Thread | RE: [xsl]Jumping out a loop AND Sta, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] XSLT FAQ? and really ques, Jeremy E. Denton | Date | Re: [xsl] concat selected text node, David Carlisle |
Month |