|
Subject: Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration problem From: Mark Nahabedian <naha@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:07:32 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) |
Dan Diebolt writes:
> If you are low on nodes, why can't you take your random-nodes from
> both the stylesheet and source XML document?
>
> xsl:variable name="random-nodes"
> select="document('')//node()|//node()" />
I know that the source XML document has enough nodes since the
elements that I need to use the random nodes iteration hack for is a
subset of it. I don't know for sure if the XSLT transform document
will have enough nodes. I was just wondering why this "design
pattern" was typically described using "document('')//node()" when
"//node()" seemed to be more correct.
[...]
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Dan Diebolt | Thread | Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Wendell Piez |
| Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Dan Diebolt | Date | [xsl] Q on <xsl:sort>, Walter Torres |
| Month |