Subject: Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration problem From: Mark Nahabedian <naha@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 16:07:32 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) |
Dan Diebolt writes: > If you are low on nodes, why can't you take your random-nodes from > both the stylesheet and source XML document? > > xsl:variable name="random-nodes" > select="document('')//node()|//node()" /> I know that the source XML document has enough nodes since the elements that I need to use the random nodes iteration hack for is a subset of it. I don't know for sure if the XSLT transform document will have enough nodes. I was just wondering why this "design pattern" was typically described using "document('')//node()" when "//node()" seemed to be more correct. [...] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Dan Diebolt | Thread | Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] ordering and iteration pr, Dan Diebolt | Date | [xsl] Q on <xsl:sort>, Walter Torres |
Month |