Subject: RE: [xsl] dubious certification questions From: "Dylan Walsh" <Dylan.Walsh@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:00:44 +0100 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Black [SMTP:enigma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 7:07 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] dubious certification questions > >As a "potential employer" I look for pervious production experience. >Sometimes I ask for code samples, etc. I've never mad a decision to hire >someone based on certification, because, uh, I've seen the tests :) Some certifications are better than others. For example, the Sun Java programmer certification sets a high standard. For XML/XSL, IBMs XML Developer certification, while not without it flaws, is a cut above the Brainbench exam. Even that exam, while being easy for those of use that have been using XSL for a year or more, does IMHO show that the person has more than enough knowledge to do the bulk of everyday XSLT related tasks. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] dubious certification que, Alex Black | Thread | [xsl] xsl:include is necessary afte, Evan Lenz |
[xsl] xsl:copy-of, Mayura Malagala | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl:variables, Michael Kay |
Month |