RE: [xsl] dubious certification questions

Subject: RE: [xsl] dubious certification questions
From: "Dylan Walsh" <Dylan.Walsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:00:44 +0100
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Alex Black [SMTP:enigma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent:	Friday, May 18, 2001 7:07 PM
> To:	xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:	Re: [xsl] dubious certification questions
> 
>As a "potential employer" I look for pervious production experience.
>Sometimes I ask for code samples, etc. I've never mad a decision to
hire
>someone based on certification, because, uh, I've seen the tests :)

Some certifications are better than others. For example, the Sun Java
programmer certification sets a high standard.
For XML/XSL, IBMs XML Developer certification, while not without it
flaws, is a cut above the Brainbench exam.
Even that exam, while being easy for those of use that have been using
XSL for a year or more, does IMHO show that the person has more than
enough knowledge to do the bulk of everyday XSLT related tasks.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread