Subject: Re: [xsl] xml->xsl->pdf From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:36:53 +0100 |
> But you'll have to do it with a validating parser, because I > don't think a non-validating one will honour a [re]definition of > & neither will a validating one (since it is a violation of the XML spec) Nor will an SGML based one (such as nsgmls) as it will be deemed to be after the declaration in the SGML declaration for xml and so ignored as only the first definition counts. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call 01285 884400. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xml->xsl->pdf, Peter Flynn | Thread | Re: [xsl] xml->xsl->pdf, james wilson |
Re: [xsl] Quark Express, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] xsl:varaible, Janning Vygen |
Month |