Subject: Re: [xsl] Leading + From: Johannes Döbler <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 17:29:27 +0200 |
Hi,
according to the XPath spec, number('+1') should return NaN, shouldn't it?. But it seems, XT, Saxon, Xalan and OracleXSL don't agree with me.
Who is right? Cheers, Oliver
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Sorting date in xsl, Hahn, Kimberly | Thread | Re: [xsl] Leading +, Trevor Nash |
[xsl] Generating embedded XSL style, petteri . sulonen | Date | Re: [xsl] Leading +, Trevor Nash |
Month |