Subject: RE: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN From: "Schwartz, Rechell R, NLCIO" <rrschwartz@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:35:48 -0400 |
Is Saxon compatible with the Apache XML Parser (Xerces) or does one need to install a SAXON XML parser too? Rechell Schwartz -----Original Message----- From: Goetz Bock [mailto:bock@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:03 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN On Tue, Jun 19 '01 at 10:59, kfricovsky wrote: > Currently we use XALAN here at work. > > I've been pushing to start using SAXON, because it is what I am most > familiar with, but I also have heard good things about MSXML. Xalan and Saxon are both Java programe, MSXML only works on Windows. > I'm just wondering... Should I look into MSXML instead? I go with saxon, where ever I can, but I use MSXML 3.0(sp1) for Clientside XSL-T (it's limited for IE only, but thats ok for these special cases) Goetz. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Result count in a for-eac, Conor Ryan | Thread | Re: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN, Goetz Bock |
Re: [xsl] Result count in a for-eac, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] Re: Any Doc to XML converter , Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |