Subject: Re: [xsl] conditional statements From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:18:04 +0100 |
> i assume that this statement will check for the BCID'S why do you assume that? It's not what the spec says, and you indicate that it's not what your experiments showed. Like most functions that take a string argument, contains() if given a node set takes the string value of the first node in document order, and ignores the rest. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] conditional statements, Earl Spencer | Thread | Re: [xsl] conditional statements, Earl Spencer |
[xsl] Document() Problem:, Gavin Myers | Date | RE: [xsl] Language translation, Clapham, Paul |
Month |