Subject: Re: [xsl] recursions? From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:26:05 +0100 |
Hi Wendell, > This would work, wouldn't it Jeni? It's kind of a refinement of the > count(ancestor::*) technique. Yep, good point :) (Although if you're doing deep nesting it's probably slightly more efficient to pass down a parameter as you go rather than iterate over all the ancestors of each node.) Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] recursions?, Wendell Piez | Thread | [xsl] Background color change not w, Betty . Risher |
Re: [xsl] Difference between "/" an, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] Performance problem in tr, Jeni Tennison |
Month |