Subject: RE: [xsl] what can you do with {} and @@ (was: Generating Link Re ferences) From: "Clapham, Paul" <pclapham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 08:30:56 -0700 |
You did, but at least for me, your follow-up arrived several minutes before the post it was referring to. Perhaps there's a theory of relativity for mailing lists? PC2 -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: June 29, 2001 03:40 To: RdVries@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] what can you do with {} and @@ (was: Generating Link References) > Are the double @@ necessary to get one @? No, as I indicated (I thought) in my follow up, the two @@ were a typo there should just be one. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] passing parameters with I, Goetz Bock | Thread | RE: [xsl] Quark -> XSL -> XML, Fenton, Brigitte (Th |
Re: [xsl] xsl:sort Please Help, Paul_B_Grimes | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl:sort Please Help, Schwartz, Rechell R, |
Month |