Re: [xsl] One for tomorrow :-)

Subject: Re: [xsl] One for tomorrow :-)
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 17:44:56 +0100
> I think he wants to stop at the first following sibling that doesn't end in
> ",", 

perhaps, but (apart from the fact I can't spell select) I tried to
answer the question as asked not the question as perhaps intended.
(Admittedly doing the latter is probably more useful:-)

Just in case, here's a version answering that, again avoiding recursion
(even though recursion is good for the soul)

  <xsl:value-of select=".">
  <xsl:for-each select="following-sibling:*
              or not(preceding-sibling:*)]
   <xsl:value-of select=".">

even less tested than last time


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread