Subject: Re: [xsl] simple XPath question From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 13:44:08 +0100 |
No apologies needed. Thanks for being here, Jeni. Wendell
Hi Wendell,
>>They probably wanted to make sure that they could make some money by >>writing books explaining it ;) > > Except how many of em did?! (Steve Muench I guess. Good book, too. > But not about XPath!) > > Mike only becoming a "designer" *after* his book was out....
I was being flippant. The idea that the XSL WG would conspire to tailor XSLT specifically to be hard to understand in order to make a profit, but have their entrepreneurial foresight be stymied by Mr Kay's dedication to the cause appealed to me :)
Sorry.
Jeni
___&&__&_&___&_&__&&&__&_&__&__&&____&&_&___&__&_&&_____&__&__&&_____&_&&_ "Thus I make my own use of the telegraph, without consulting the directors, like the sparrows, which I perceive use it extensively for a perch." -- Thoreau
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] simple XPath question, Jeni Tennison | Thread | [xsl] Xalan Redirect?, Ruairi |
RE: [xsl] Empty nodes - more inform, Dominic J. Blythe | Date | RE: [xsl] Empty nodes - more inform, Benoit_Aumars |
Month |