Re: [xsl] Re: Bug Talk on the List (was A serious bug in MSXML 4.0)

Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Bug Talk on the List (was A serious bug in MSXML 4.0)
From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 07:40:05 +0100
+1 to bug notification with respect to xslt related vendor products, most of
our time is either spent discovering, killing or killing them.

mornin, jim fuller

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 7:34 AM
Subject: [xsl] Re: Bug Talk on the List (was A serious bug in MSXML 4.0)

> Mulberry Technologies List Owner wrote:
> > The XSL-List is indeed a suitable forum for discussion of bugs in XSL
tools. This
> > community is interested in knowing about XSL tools, including their
bugs. And,
> > more important, we can be helpful in separating errors in installation
and use
> > from software bugs (not always obvious).
> > Such discussion is no substitute for reporting any bugs to the
> > of the software, but that does not mean it is out of place here.
> > This discussion does prompt me to thank all of the List Courtesy
Vigilantes who
> > have been admonishing others keep their elbows off the list's dinner
table.  Such
> > vigilantism is generally unnecessary (if someone gets out of line I
usually send
> > them a private message) and is often more discourteous than the behavior
for which
> > a well intended poster is being chastised.
> Completely agree!
> In this particular case the message of A.Gutman, combined with another bug
report of
> his on the MS newsgroups -- this helped me decide not to use the July beta
and saved
> me a lot of time and worries.
> So, I think that any information that will help list members and save
their time is
> welcome.
> Dimitre Novatchev.
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
>  XSL-List info and archive:

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread