Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT Processor Detection From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 10:29:55 +0100 |
> Well, the processor-version.xsl on mulberrytech.com seems to > work correctly. > I think this is because if you have the old version, only > the WD-xsl code > is processed, while if you have the new version, only the > XSLT code is > processed. Yes, sorry - this example has been carefully coded so it only executes the instructions in one language or the other, never both. (How does MSXML3 work when it finds both namespaces present in a stylesheet - which one takes precedence?) I've seen too many examples of people thinking they can *really* mix the two languages. Mike Kay Software AG > >Mixing WD-xsl and XSLT in the same stylesheet is like mixing > COBOL and > >FORTRAN in the same program. It doesn't work. > > > >Mike Kay > >Software AG > > > > > > XSL-List info and archive: > http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT Processor Detection, Tony Graham | Thread | [xsl] <xml:variable> alternative fo, Nidhi Wadehra |
RE: [xsl] XSLT Processor Detection, Tony Graham | Date | [xsl] Re: Re: Is a node a first/las, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |